Monday, May 31, 2010

Stomach Virus And Night

L'etica, la persona e il diritto




Perhaps it would be good to take stock of the situation with regard to abortion and to establish what is reliable and biologically confirmed by what is the work of social and legal conventions, beyond mental saws, UFO biological, statements such abstruse even deny that the embryo is a living being, useless list of comparative features between embryo and adult, odd subdivisions of types of living life like "organic" and life "biography" and so on.



So, we know that birth is not the initial event of a living organism which is the human being, but only a transition between two different forms of existence, between two different stages of development . The moment when a human organism begins to exist is certainly the conception. And this è una cosa biologicamente certa.
Il concetto di persona è invece un concetto attinente la filosofia e consiste nel possesso di alcuni caratteri. Caratteri che possono variare a seconda dei contesti e delle epoche, e pertano il concetto di persona non è affatto certo e immutabile.
Ma qui non ci interessa la persona in senso filosofico, se si tratti di chi assume la forma di un ruolo, un posto, un certo comportamento o altro. Qui ci interessa la persona in senso giuridico, ossia l'essere umano che è soggetto di diritto ed è pertanto titolare di diritti umani.
Sarebbe a dire che ci interessa vedere i criteri con cui si stabilisce se un essere umano è holder or not human rights.

Now we determine whether and when a given individual human beings can have rights is a question relating to human ethics.

Leaving aside the ethics of a religious nature which bring a whole set of responsibilities and rights to a divine dimension, the secular ethics can be divided into two types based on two different types of principles:

1. ethics is based on the criterion of certainty and fully extended. According to this principle, the man has a duty to himself to determine what ethical basis more reliable and clear as possible and be released from arbitrariness.
Needless to say, according to this principle all human individuals exist should be recognized as holders of human rights and therefore human rights should be allocated from conception, as we have seen, is the actual start of a new human individuality.

2. Ethics based on pragmatic and utilitarian criteria. According to this type of ethical matters should be established according to the utility involved. If now we should legalize abortion set criteria to do so to give human rights to those individuals that come from that can include items of possible abortion.
But this principle could be extended in many other areas and has been always followed. For example, people in ancient times were regarded as free men and slaves.

establish that every human being is the holder of the existing human rights, then that person is legally speaking regardless of whether the person can be in a philosophical sense or not, is the work of ethics based on the criterion of certainty and not discrimination.

Set instead of a human being is a holder of human rights only if they possess certain characteristics, ie a level of development that takes these characters, even those characters in a given context such as that occidentale odierno può essere considerato persona in senso filosofico, è frutto di un'etica fondata su criteri pragmatistici.
Spesso però l'etica pragmatica e utilitaristica può mascherarsi di "certezza" se assume quell'atteggiamento di "oggettivizzare" i criteri su cui si fonda. Per esempio far coincidere il riconoscimento di una persona in senso giuridico col fatto che questa possa essere considerata persona in senso filosofico e dando per certi e scontati, se non addirittura eterni e immutabili, i criteri su cui si fonda il concetto di persona in senso filosofico, è un'opera di mascheramento del carattere arbitrario dell'etica pragmatica.

Sinceramente I would live more comfortable and I feel safer in a world that is based on the first type of ethics, at least in the most important things such as human life. And it also would consider a more just world.


GIUBIZZA www.giubizza.tk

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Shota Manga Read Online

La catena ormai spezzata


a major cause of hatred against the Catholic religion is now so widespread that it is the religion of our fathers and fathers of our fathers. A religion that has been passed down through the centuries from generation to generation through an agreement profodna established between fathers and sons and now we hate so much, hate this and want continuity, rightly or wrongly, break it.

I think that in reality it is largely hatred we feel toward our fathers. But that is because this hatred? Someone has instilled, or was born to very specific cases? We have perhaps betrayed? We have been deceived? We were then promised that things have never given or that they are appropriate only leaving empty-handed? What has failed in us?

What broke that understanding deep that was handed down from father to son? What made fathers and sons so often enemies and strangers to each other as they are today?
GIUBIZZA
www.giubizza.tk