Perhaps it would be good to take stock of the situation with regard to abortion and to establish what is reliable and biologically confirmed by what is the work of social and legal conventions, beyond mental saws, UFO biological, statements such abstruse even deny that the embryo is a living being, useless list of comparative features between embryo and adult, odd subdivisions of types of living life like "organic" and life "biography" and so on.
So, we know that birth is not the initial event of a living organism which is the human being, but only a transition between two different forms of existence, between two different stages of development . The moment when a human organism begins to exist is certainly the conception. And this è una cosa biologicamente certa.
Il concetto di persona è invece un concetto attinente la filosofia e consiste nel possesso di alcuni caratteri. Caratteri che possono variare a seconda dei contesti e delle epoche, e pertano il concetto di persona non è affatto certo e immutabile.
Leaving aside the ethics of a religious nature which bring a whole set of responsibilities and rights to a divine dimension, the secular ethics can be divided into two types based on two different types of principles:
1. ethics is based on the criterion of certainty and fully extended. According to this principle, the man has a duty to himself to determine what ethical basis more reliable and clear as possible and be released from arbitrariness.
Needless to say, according to this principle all human individuals exist should be recognized as holders of human rights and therefore human rights should be allocated from conception, as we have seen, is the actual start of a new human individuality.
2. Ethics based on pragmatic and utilitarian criteria. According to this type of ethical matters should be established according to the utility involved. If now we should legalize abortion set criteria to do so to give human rights to those individuals that come from that can include items of possible abortion.
But this principle could be extended in many other areas and has been always followed. For example, people in ancient times were regarded as free men and slaves.
establish that every human being is the holder of the existing human rights, then that person is legally speaking regardless of whether the person can be in a philosophical sense or not, is the work of ethics based on the criterion of certainty and not discrimination.
Set instead of a human being is a holder of human rights only if they possess certain characteristics, ie a level of development that takes these characters, even those characters in a given context such as that occidentale odierno può essere considerato persona in senso filosofico, è frutto di un'etica fondata su criteri pragmatistici.
GIUBIZZA www.giubizza.tk
0 comments:
Post a Comment